Abstract
Concepts and terminology for classifying seizures and epilepsies have, until recently, rested on ideas developed nearly a century ago. In order for clinical epilepsy and practice to benefit fully from the major technological and scientific advances of the last several years, advances that are revolutionizing our understanding and treatment of the epilepsies, it is necessary to break with the older vocabulary and approaches to classifying epilepsies and seizures. The Commission on Classification and Terminology made specific recommendations to move this process along and ensure that classification will reflect the best knowledge, will not be arbitrary, and will ultimately serve the purpose of improving clinical practice as well as research on many levels. The recommendations include new terms and concepts for etiology and seizure types as well as abandoning the 1989 classification structure and replacing it instead with a flexible multidimensional approach in which the most relevant features for a specific purpose can be emphasized. This is not a finished product and will take yet more time to achieve. Waiting any longer, however, would be a disservice to patient care and will continue the longstanding frustrations with the earlier system which, at this point in time, can be viewed as both antiquated and arbitrary.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Multiway analysis of epilepsy tensors
Abstract Motivation: The success or failure of an epilepsy surgery depends greatly on the localization of epileptic focus (origin of a seizure). We address the problem of identi...
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The ...
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Abstract Background and objectives: The expansion of evidence‐based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminol...
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines with recommendati...
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes:<i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022</i>
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes” includes the ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the compo...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2011
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1058-1062
- Citations
- 300
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03101.x