Abstract

Many neural network classifiers provide outputs which estimate Bayesian a posteriori probabilities. When the estimation is accurate, network outputs can be treated as probabilities and sum to one. Simple proofs show that Bayesian probabilities are estimated when desired network outputs are 1 of M (one output unity, all others zero) and a squared-error or cross-entropy cost function is used. Results of Monte Carlo simulations performed using multilayer perceptron (MLP) networks trained with backpropagation, radial basis function (RBF) networks, and high-order polynomial networks graphically demonstrate that network outputs provide good estimates of Bayesian probabilities. Estimation accuracy depends on network complexity, the amount of training data, and the degree to which training data reflect true likelihood distributions and a priori class probabilities. Interpretation of network outputs as Bayesian probabilities allows outputs from multiple networks to be combined for higher level decision making, simplifies creation of rejection thresholds, makes it possible to compensate for differences between pattern class probabilities in training and test data, allows outputs to be used to minimize alternative risk functions, and suggests alternative measures of network performance.

Keywords

Artificial neural networkA priori and a posterioriComputer scienceMultilayer perceptronBayesian probabilityMaximum a posteriori estimationArtificial intelligenceMachine learningBayes' theoremBayesian networkBackpropagationPerceptronAlgorithmMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)StatisticsMaximum likelihood

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
461-483
Citations
985
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

985
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael D. Richard, Richard P. Lippmann (1991). Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian <i>a posteriori</i> Probabilities. Neural Computation , 3 (4) , 461-483. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1991.3.4.461

Identifiers

DOI
10.1162/neco.1991.3.4.461