Abstract

Parents’ decision to use vaccination services is complex and multi-factorial. Of particular interest are “vaccine-hesitant” parents who are in the middle of the continuum between vaccine acceptance and refusal. The objective of this qualitative longitudinal study was to better understand why mothers choose to vaccinate—or not—their newborns. Fifty-six pregnant mothers living in different areas of Quebec (Canada) were interviewed. These interviews gathered information on mothers’ views about health and vaccination. Almost half of the mothers were categorized as vaccine-hesitant. A second interview was conducted with these mothers 3 to 11 months after birth to look at their actual decision and behavior concerning vaccination. Our results show the heterogeneity of factors influencing vaccine decision making. Although the majority of vaccine-hesitant mothers finally chose to follow the recommended vaccine schedule for their child, they were still ambivalent and they continued to question their decision.

Keywords

VaccinationAmbivalenceVaccination scheduleQualitative researchPsychologyScheduleFamily medicineMedicineDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyImmunizationImmunology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2015
Type
article
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
411-425
Citations
155
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

155
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ève Dubé, Maryline Vivion, Chantal Sauvageau et al. (2015). “Nature Does Things Well, Why Should We Interfere?”. Qualitative Health Research , 26 (3) , 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315573207

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/1049732315573207