Abstract

In myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), controversy persists regarding the usefulness and reproducibility of bone marrow (BM) features. Disagreements concerning the WHO classification are mainly focused on the discrimination between essential thrombocythemia (ET) and prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (prePMF) and prodromal polycythemia vera (PV). Criticism mostly refers to lack of standardization of distinctive BM features precluding correct morphological pattern recognition. The distinction between WHO‐defined ET and prePMF is not trivial because outcome is significantly worse in prePMF. Morphology was generally considered to be non‐specific for the diagnosis of PV. Recent studies have revealed under‐diagnosis of morphologically and biologically consistent PV. Am. J. Hematol. 91:430–433, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

Morphology (biology)MedicinePathologyBiologyGenetics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2015
Type
review
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
430-433
Citations
49
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

49
OpenAlex

Cite This

Tiziano Barbui, Jürgen Thiele, Alessandro M. Vannucchi et al. (2015). Myeloproliferative neoplasms: Morphology and clinical practice. American Journal of Hematology , 91 (4) , 430-433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24288

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/ajh.24288