Abstract
Abstract The basic ideas of multiple testing are outlined and the problem of how to control the probability of erroneous decisions is discussed. The main emphasis is on the concept of the multiple level of significance (controlling the experiment, or family error in the strong sense) which can be achieved by applying the principle of closed tests. Various practical situations encountered in multiple testing in clinical trials are considered: more than one end point; more than two treatments, such as comparisons with a single control, comparisons using ordered alternatives, all pairwise comparisons and contrast methods; and more than one trial. Tests based on global statistics, the union intersection principle and other criteria are discussed. The application of the multiple test concept in sequential sampling is investigated. Finally some comments are made on multiple power, multiple confidence intervals and directed decisions.
Keywords
MeSH Terms
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical Trials
Reports of clinical trials often contain a wealth of data comparing treatments. This can lead to problems in interpretation, particularly when significance testing is used exten...
Multiple Hypotheses Testing with Weights
In this paper we offer a multiplicity of approaches and procedures for multiple testing problems with weights. Some rationale for incorporating weights in multiple hypotheses te...
A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
Summary Multiple-hypothesis testing involves guarding against much more complicated errors than single-hypothesis testing. Whereas we typically control the type I error rate for...
Testing Statistical Hypotheses
This chapter presents the basic concepts and results of the theory of testing statistical hypotheses. The generalized likelihood ratio tests that are discussed can be applied to...
Any casualties in the clash of randomised and observational evidence?
Randomised controlled trials and observational studies are often seen as mutually exclusive, if not opposing, methods of clinical research. Two recent reports, however, identifi...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1991
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 871-890
- Citations
- 235
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/sim.4780100609
- PMID
- 1831562