Abstract
Abstract Since Weber's analysis of modernity through the category of rationalization, diagnosing the irrationality of this rationalization had been a central preoccupation of critical theory. Marcuse ended his “Industrialization and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber” with the question: “Is there perhaps already in Max Weber's concept of reason that irony that understands but disavows? Does he by any chance mean to say: And this you call ‘reason’?” Marcuse's question was not unjustified, for it pointed to an unresolved ambivalence in Weber's own work on modernity. In diagnosing that societal rationalization processes would inevitably result in a loss of freedom (Freiheitsverlust), whereas Western cultural rationalism would lead to an irreversible loss of meaning (Sinnverlust), Weber provided a highly ambivalent evaluation of the significance of modernity in the West.
Keywords
ModernityAmbivalenceRationalization (economics)EpistemologyIrrationalityCapitalismPhilosophyCritical theorySociologyPositive economicsPsychoanalysisPolitical scienceEconomicsLawPsychologyRationality
Related Publications
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
(1993). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Economic Geography: Vol. 69, Theme Issue: Environment and Development, Part 2, pp. 432-436.
Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference
Acknowlegments ix Introduction: The Idea of Provincializing Europe 3 Part One: Historicism and the Narration of Modernity Chapter 1. Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1981
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 1981
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 39-59
- Citations
- 27
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
27
OpenAlex
Cite This
S. Benhabib
(1981).
Modernity and the Aporias of Critical Theory.
Telos
, 1981
(49)
, 39-59.
https://doi.org/10.3817/0981049039
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.3817/0981049039