Abstract

The current methodological policy in Psychophysiology stipulates that repeated‐measures designs be analyzed using either multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) or repeated‐measures ANOVA with the Greenhouse–Geisser or Huynh–Feldt correction. Both techniques lead to appropriate type I error probabilities under general assumptions about the variance‐covariance matrix of the data. This report introduces mixed‐effects models as an alternative procedure for the analysis of repeated‐measures data in Psychophysiology . Mixed‐effects models have many advantages over the traditional methods: They handle missing data more effectively and are more efficient, parsimonious, and flexible. We described mixed‐effects modeling and illustrated its applicability with a simple example.

Keywords

PsychophysiologyRepeated measures designAnalysis of varianceVariance (accounting)PsychologyMultivariate statisticsMixed-design analysis of varianceAnalysis of covarianceMultivariate analysis of varianceStatisticsCovarianceMissing dataEconometricsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
Citations
303
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

303
OpenAlex

Cite This

Emilia Bagiella, Richard P. Sloan, Daniel F. Heitjan (2000). Mixed‐effects models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology , 37 (1) , 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3710013

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/1469-8986.3710013