Abstract

Military institutions have strongly and persistently affected other social and economic institutions, a reality largely ignored by modern scholars of whatever political persuasion. The problem begins with an inability--or unwillingness-to understand military institutions on their own terms. Conservative and Marxist economists alike, for instance, can offer no theory to explain either the causes or the effects of innovation in military technology.' Weaponry clearly changes for reasons that may owe little or nothing to the marketplace, and novel weapons may alter every aspect of society.2 This is not merely a matter of the sporadic impact of a specific war or wars, or even of war in

Keywords

Subordination (linguistics)Work (physics)Process (computing)Technological changeLabour economicsSociologyPolitical scienceEconomicsEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringMacroeconomicsPhilosophy

Related Publications

Measuring Geopolitical Risk

We present a news-based measure of adverse geopolitical events and associated risks. The geopolitical risk (GPR) index spikes around the two world wars, at the beginning of the ...

2022 American Economic Review 2517 citations

Institutions and organizations

Institutions—the structures, practices, and meanings that define what people and organizations think, do, and aspire to—are created through process. They are “work in progress” ...

1995 Choice Reviews Online 8140 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
743-743
Citations
13
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

13
OpenAlex

Cite This

Barton C. Hacker, Sally L. Hacker (1987). Military Institutions and the Labor Process: Noneconomic Sources of Technological Change, Women's Subordination, and the Organization of Work. Technology and Culture , 28 (4) , 743-743. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105181

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3105181