Abstract
A framework for synthesizing qualitative findings is described, and issues surrounding employment of this technique are discussed. Further debate on these issues is encouraged to develop and refine this framework. The practical importance of interpretive meta-synthesis is highlighted in relation to theory development.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Qualitative methodologies II: a brief guide to applying interpretative phenomenological analysis in musculoskeletal care
Abstract In this paper, we conclude our two‐part series discussing how readers of Musculoskeletal Care might employ qualitative methods. In the first paper of the series, we foc...
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
Systematic review has developed as a specific methodology for searching for, appraising and synthesizing findings of primary studies, and has rapidly become a cornerstone of the...
Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities
Despite theoretical differences and methodological questions, the conversation about synthesizing qualitative research raises interest. Meta-ethnography, as initially described ...
Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues
Content analysis research methodology is detailed, its procedures are described, some examples of its application are provided, and the controversial issues surrounding its use ...
The integrative review: updated methodology
Aim. The aim of this paper is to distinguish the integrative review method from other review methods and to propose methodological strategies specific to the integrative review ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-560
- Citations
- 477
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/104973239600600407