Abstract

Quality of life research is an emerging science of particular relevance to clinical cancer research. The development and utilization of valid and reliable quality of life measures as outcome parameters may profoundly alter the clinical trials process. Such measures, contrary to prevailing opinion, may be as accurate and precise as conventional measures, but considerably more relevant to the trials process. However, lack of rigor in the evaluation of such indices and uncritical interpretation of results may seriously compromise the credibility of the concept. This overview of the current status of quality of life research is designed to provide a perspective from which to evaluate ongoing development.

Keywords

MedicineCredibilityQuality of life (healthcare)Quality (philosophy)RigourClinical trialRelevance (law)CompromiseRisk analysis (engineering)Process (computing)Perspective (graphical)Interpretation (philosophy)Intensive care medicineManagement sciencePathologyEpistemologyComputer scienceNursing

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1985
Type
article
Volume
69
Issue
10
Pages
1115-25
Citations
154
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

154
OpenAlex

Cite This

Harvey Schipper, Michael D. Levitt (1985). Measuring quality of life: risks and benefits.. PubMed , 69 (10) , 1115-25.