Abstract

The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is essential for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. This article provides an updated American Heart Association scientific statement on BP measurement in humans. In the office setting, many oscillometric devices have been validated that allow accurate BP measurement while reducing human errors associated with the auscultatory approach. Fully automated oscillometric devices capable of taking multiple readings even without an observer being present may provide a more accurate measurement of BP than auscultation. Studies have shown substantial differences in BP when measured outside versus in the office setting. Ambulatory BP monitoring is considered the reference standard for out-of-office BP assessment, with home BP monitoring being an alternative when ambulatory BP monitoring is not available or tolerated. Compared with their counterparts with sustained normotension (ie, nonhypertensive BP levels in and outside the office setting), it is unclear whether adults with white-coat hypertension (ie, hypertensive BP levels in the office but not outside the office) have increased cardiovascular disease risk, whereas those with masked hypertension (ie, hypertensive BP levels outside the office but not in the office) are at substantially increased risk. In addition, high nighttime BP on ambulatory BP monitoring is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk. Both oscillometric and auscultatory methods are considered acceptable for measuring BP in children and adolescents. Regardless of the method used to measure BP, initial and ongoing training of technicians and healthcare providers and the use of validated and calibrated devices are critical for obtaining accurate BP measurements.

Keywords

MedicineMasked HypertensionBlood pressureAmbulatoryAmbulatory blood pressureAuscultationWhite coat hypertensionPhysician OfficeEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineCardiologyHealth care

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers

Editor—Users of mercury sphygmomanometers are being advised to consider alternatives, but this is causing problems.1,2 Currently there is confusion over the advantages and disad...

2001 BMJ 9 citations

Publication Info

Year
2019
Type
review
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
e35-e66
Citations
1309
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1309
OpenAlex

Cite This

Paul Muntner, Daichi Shimbo, Robert M. Carey et al. (2019). Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension , 73 (5) , e35-e66. https://doi.org/10.1161/hyp.0000000000000087

Identifiers

DOI
10.1161/hyp.0000000000000087