Abstract

The debate on mass polarization is itself polarized. Some argue that the United States is in the midst of a culture war; others argue that the claims are exaggerated. As polarization is a multifaceted concept, both sides can be correct. I review four distinct manifestations of polarization that have appeared in the public opinion literature—ideological consistency, ideological divergence, perceived polarization, and affective polarization—and discuss ways in which each has been measured. Then, using longitudinal data from the American National Election Studies (ANES), I update past analyses in order to more clearly show the ways in which Americans have or have not polarized: Americans at the mass level have not diverged, nor have they become more consistent ideologically, but partisans have; perceptions of polarization have increased, but this change is driven by partisans, who increasingly dislike one another.

Keywords

Polarization (electrochemistry)IdeologyPublic opinionPolitical sciencePoliticsLawChemistry

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Is Polarization a Myth?

This article uses data from the American National Election Studies and national exit polls to test Fiorina's assertion that ideological polarization in the American public is a ...

2008 The Journal of Politics 1188 citations

Publication Info

Year
2016
Type
article
Volume
80
Issue
S1
Pages
392-410
Citations
539
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

539
OpenAlex

Cite This

Yphtach Lelkes (2016). Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly , 80 (S1) , 392-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw005

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/poq/nfw005