Abstract

Second opinion surgical pathology can result in major therapeutic and prognostic modifications for patients sent to large referral hospitals. Although the overall percentage of affected cases is not large, the consistent rate of discrepant diagnosis uncovered by second opinion surgical pathology may have an enormous human and financial impact. Accordingly, the authors recommend that review of the original histologic material should be undertaken prior to the institution of a major therapeutic endeavor.

Keywords

MedicineSurgical pathologySecond opinionGenitourinary systemGeneral surgeryMedical diagnosisSurgeryPathologyInternal medicine

MeSH Terms

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChildPreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalsTeachingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsObserver VariationPathologyClinicalQuality AssuranceHealth CareReferral and Consultation

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
86
Issue
11
Pages
2426-2435
Citations
289
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

289
OpenAlex
2
Influential
223
CrossRef

Cite This

Joseph D. Kronz, William H. Westra, Jonathan I. Epstein (1999). Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital. Cancer , 86 (11) , 2426-2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991201)86:11<2426::aid-cncr34>3.0.co;2-3

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991201)86:11<2426::aid-cncr34>3.0.co;2-3
PMID
10590387

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%