Abstract
Second opinion surgical pathology can result in major therapeutic and prognostic modifications for patients sent to large referral hospitals. Although the overall percentage of affected cases is not large, the consistent rate of discrepant diagnosis uncovered by second opinion surgical pathology may have an enormous human and financial impact. Accordingly, the authors recommend that review of the original histologic material should be undertaken prior to the institution of a major therapeutic endeavor.
Keywords
MeSH Terms
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The impact of pathology review on treatment recommendations for patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate
This study was designed to estimate the frequency with which changes in Gleason score because of a genitourinary pathologist's review changed prostate cancer treatment recommend...
Advances in the surgical management of pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic cancer continues to pose a major public health concern and clinical challenge. The incidence of the disease is nearly equivalent to the death rate associated with the...
Changes in breast cancer therapy because of pathology second opinions
Examination of pathology slides is a routine part of a breast cancer second opinion. The purpose of this study was to determine how often the pathologic second opinion (1) alter...
Nonâalcoholic steatohepatitis: Definitions and pathogenesis
The term 'non-alcoholic steatohepatitis' or NASH was first used by Ludwig et al. in 1980 to describe 'the pathological and clinical features of non-alcoholic disease of the live...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1999
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2426-2435
- Citations
- 289
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991201)86:11<2426::aid-cncr34>3.0.co;2-3
- PMID
- 10590387