Abstract

This paper presents a discourse analysis of a report of a tribunal of inquiry in order to further our understanding of inquiry team sensemaking. The subject of the paper is the report of the Allitt Inquiry into attacks on children on Ward 4 at Grantham and Kesteven Hospital in the UK. Premised on an understanding of the report as an exercise in sensemaking, and sensemaking as a narrative process, the paper illustrates how authorial strategies centred on issues of normalization, observation and absolution are employed to create a rhetorical and verisimilitudinous artefact. This, it is argued, is accomplished as part of a more general strategy of depoliticizing the disaster event, legitimating social institutions (especially those connected with the medical profession), ameliorating anxieties by elaborating fantasies of omnipotence and control, and thenceforth acting as a sensitizing narrative archetype.

Keywords

SensemakingOmnipotenceNarrativeArchetypeTribunalRhetorical questionLegitimationSociologyEpistemologyNormalization (sociology)PsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceLawSocial sciencePhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
37
Issue
1
Citations
307
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

307
OpenAlex

Cite This

Andrew D. Brown (2000). Making Sense of Inquiry Sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies , 37 (1) . https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00172

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/1467-6486.00172