Abstract

Macrophages are found in tissues, body cavities, and mucosal surfaces. Most tissue macrophages are seeded in the early embryo before definitive hematopoiesis is established. Others are derived from blood monocytes. The macrophage lineage diversification and plasticity are key aspects of their functionality. Macrophages can also be generated from monocytes <i>in vitro</i> and undergo classical (LPS+IFN-γ) or alternative (IL-4) activation. <i>In vivo</i>, macrophages with different polarization and different activation markers coexist in tissues. Certain mouse strains preferentially promote T-helper-1 (Th1) responses and others Th2 responses. Their macrophages preferentially induce iNOS or arginase and have been called M1 and M2, respectively. In many publications, M1 and classically activated and M2 and alternatively activated are used interchangeably. We tested whether this is justified by comparing the gene lists positively [M1(=LPS+)] or negatively [M2(=LPS-)] correlated with the ratio of <i>IL-12</i> and <i>arginase 1</i> in transcriptomes of LPS-treated peritoneal macrophages with <i>in vitro</i> classically (LPS, IFN-γ) vs. alternatively activated (IL-4) bone marrow derived macrophages, both from published datasets. Although there is some overlap between <i>in vivo</i> M1(=LPS+) and <i>in vitro</i> classically activated (LPS+IFN-γ) and <i>in vivo</i> M2(=LPS-) and <i>in vitro</i> alternatively activated macrophages, many more genes are regulated in opposite or unrelated ways. Thus, M1(=LPS+) macrophages are not equivalent to classically activated, and M2(=LPS-) macrophages are not equivalent to alternatively activated macrophages. This fundamental discrepancy explains why most surface markers identified on <i>in vitro</i> generated macrophages do not translate to the <i>in vivo</i> situation. Valid <i>in vivo</i> M1/M2 surface markers remain to be discovered.

Keywords

In vivoIn vitroMacrophageMacrophage polarizationCell biologyBiologyHaematopoiesisM2 MacrophageArginaseAdipose tissue macrophagesLipopolysaccharideMolecular biologyImmunologyChemistryAdipose tissueStem cellBiochemistry

MeSH Terms

AnimalsArginineCell MovementCell PolarityChemotaxisHumansLipid MetabolismLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMiceProtein ProcessingPost-TranslationalSignal Transduction

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Blockade of Interleukin-6 Signaling Suppresses Not Only Th17 but Also Interphotoreceptor Retinoid Binding Protein–Specific Th1 by Promoting Regulatory T Cells in Experimental Autoimmune Uveoretinitis

PURPOSE. Both Th17 and Th1 cells contribute to experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockade inhibits Th17 differentiation in EAU and potently suppr...

2011 Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual ... 73 citations

Publication Info

Year
2019
Type
review
Volume
10
Pages
1084-1084
Citations
1924
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1924
OpenAlex
47
Influential
1683
CrossRef

Cite This

Marco Orecchioni, Yanal Ghosheh, Akula Bala Pramod et al. (2019). Macrophage Polarization: Different Gene Signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS–) vs. Alternatively Activated Macrophages. Frontiers in Immunology , 10 , 1084-1084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01084

Identifiers

DOI
10.3389/fimmu.2019.01084
PMID
31178859
PMCID
PMC6543837

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%