Abstract

Introductory biology courses are widely criticized for overemphasizing details and rote memorization of facts. Data to support such claims, however, are surprisingly scarce. We sought to determine whether this claim was evidence-based. To do so we quantified the cognitive level of learning targeted by faculty in introductory-level biology courses. We used Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives to assign cognitive learning levels to course goals as articulated on syllabi and individual items on high-stakes assessments (i.e., exams and quizzes). Our investigation revealed the following: 1) assessment items overwhelmingly targeted lower cognitive levels, 2) the cognitive level of articulated course goals was not predictive of the cognitive level of assessment items, and 3) there was no influence of course size or institution type on the cognitive levels of assessments. These results support the claim that introductory biology courses emphasize facts more than higher-order thinking.

Keywords

MemorizationCognitionSyllabusMathematics educationRote learningCognitive skillPsychologyTeaching methodCooperative learning

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
article
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
435-440
Citations
268
Access
Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

268
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jennifer L. Momsen, Tammy M. Long, Sara A. Wyse et al. (2010). Just the Facts? Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses Focus on Low-Level Cognitive Skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education , 9 (4) , 435-440. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0001

Identifiers

DOI
10.1187/cbe.10-01-0001