Abstract

Modern communication theory focuses to a disproportionate degree on the cultivation of shared meanings, interpretations, and emotions, and insufficiently on how coordinated action may occur under conditions of minimal self-disclosure and limited consensus. Borrowing a term from music and sports, this article describes characteristics of “jamming” experiences, instances of fluid behavioral coordination that occur without detailed knowledge of personality. Two biases in prior work—individual bias and strong culture bias—are cited as reasons why experiences like jamming have been ignored in the literature. Examples are given of how these experiences strike a balance between autonomy and interdependence, and can even be transcendent. Four preconditions for jamming—skill, structure, setting, and surrender— are also provided. Finally, possibilities for jamming in formal organizations and society are explored.

Keywords

AutonomySurrenderJammingSocial psychologyPsychologyBalance (ability)Action (physics)Work (physics)Cognitive psychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Related Publications

The Measurement of Work Autonomy

The importance of autonomy has been asserted by numerous writers in a variety of research domains, e.g., leadership, organizational climate, professionalism, and job design. In ...

1985 Human Relations 603 citations

Publication Info

Year
1990
Type
article
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
139-164
Citations
212
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

212
OpenAlex

Cite This

Eric M. Eisenberg (1990). Jamming. Communication Research , 17 (2) , 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002001

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/009365090017002001