Abstract

Although the medical literature is flooded with case descriptions, it is difficult to dismiss the significant impact that a clinical observation limited to one or two patients can have. Case reports can also play a critical role in other areas such as drug safety by serving as early warning signals for adverse drug reactions. Unlike the aggregated data and statistical abstractions of clinical trials or meta-analyses, case reports reflect the real-world context of medical practice, where decisions are made patient by patient. This alignment with everyday clinical experience makes case reports particularly relatable and valuable to practicing clinicians, offering insights that resonate far beyond the confines of population-based evidence. The “Swiss Medical Weekly” wishes to participate in the dissemination of high-quality case reports. A new section entitled “Clinical reasoning” will provide a dedicated platform for well-structured case reports while upholding the journal’s high and very strict editorial standard and its Diamond Open Access model.

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Column Editor

Will health librarians and related information workers ever work together to create an international network, such as the Cochrane Collaboration, dedicated to the purpose of pre...

2001 Health Information & Libraries Journal 15 citations

Publication Info

Year
2025
Type
editorial
Volume
155
Issue
12
Pages
5203-5203
Citations
0
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

0
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gérard Waeber, Stefano Bassetti, Stefan Weiler (2025). Is it still useful to publish case reports?. Swiss Medical Weekly , 155 (12) , 5203-5203. https://doi.org/10.57187/s.5203

Identifiers

DOI
10.57187/s.5203