Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivities: Constrained versus Unconstrained Firms

2004 The Journal of Finance 1,029 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT From the existing literature, it is not clear what effect financing constraints have on the sensitivities of firms' investment to their cash flow. I propose an explanation that reconciles the conflicting empirical evidence. I present two models: the unconstrained model, in which firms can raise external funds, and the constrained model, in which firms cannot do so. Using low dividends to identify financing constraints in my generated panel of data produces results consistent with those of Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen; using the constrained model produces results consistent with those of Kaplan and Zingales.

Keywords

Cash flowDividendInvestment (military)EconomicsPanel dataExternal financingMonetary economicsEconometricsFinance

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The Capital Structure Puzzle

Stewart C. Myers President of American Finance Association 1983 This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on “The Dividend Puzzle,” which h...

1984 The Journal of Finance 7515 citations

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
article
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
2061-2092
Citations
1029
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1029
OpenAlex

Cite This

Nathalie Moyen (2004). Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivities: Constrained versus Unconstrained Firms. The Journal of Finance , 59 (5) , 2061-2092. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00692.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00692.x