Abstract
How decision makers define state interests and formulate policies to deal with complex and technical issues can be a function of the manner in which the issues are represented by specialists to whom they turn for advice in the face of uncertainty. The contributors to this issue examine the role that networks of knowledge-based experts—epistemic communities—play in articulating the cause-and-effect relationships of complex problems, helping states identify their interests, framing the issues for collective debate, proposing specific policies, and identifying salient points for negotiation. Their analyses demonstrate that control over knowledge and information is an important dimension of power and that the diffusion of new ideas and data can lead to new patterns of behavior and prove to be an important determinant of international policy coordination.
Keywords
Related Publications
Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations
Students of world politics have tended to assume that states act as units. Yet trans-governmental relations—direct interactions among sub-units not controlled or closely guided ...
Bringing the State Back in
Until recently, dominant theoretical paradigms in the comparative social sciences did not highlight states as organizational structures or as potentially autonomous actors. Inde...
Logics for reasoning about knowledge and belief
Abstract AI researchers are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of reasoning about knowledge and belief. This paper reviews epistemic logic, a logic designed specifica...
Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment
Prior research has generated considerable knowledge on information systems design from software engineering and user-acceptance perspectives. As organizational processes are inc...
Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games
Domestic politics and international relations are often inextricably entangled, but existing theories (particularly “state-centric” theories) do not adequately account for these...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1992
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-35
- Citations
- 7135
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1017/s0020818300001442