Abstract

In patients who are haemodynamically stable, the RRT modality does not appear to influence important patient outcomes, and therefore the preference for CRRT over IRRT in such patients does not appear justified in the light of available evidence. CRRT was shown to achieve better haemodynamic parameters such as MAP. Future research should focus on factors such as the dose of dialysis and evaluation of newer promising hybrid technologies such as SLED. Triallists should follow the recommendations regarding clinical endpoints assessment in RCTs in ARF made by the Working Group of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Working Group.

Keywords

MedicineRenal replacement therapyRelative riskConfidence intervalMeta-analysisInternal medicineCochrane Library

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2007
Type
article
Issue
3
Pages
CD003773-CD003773
Citations
314
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

314
OpenAlex

Cite This

Kannaiyan S Rabindranath, James M. Adams, Alison M. MacLeod et al. (2007). Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3) , CD003773-CD003773. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003773.pub3

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/14651858.cd003773.pub3