Abstract

In their comment on the article by S. B. Hamann, L. R. Squire, and D. L. Schacter (1995), A. L. Ostergaard and T. L. Jernigan (1996) reaffirmed their position that baseline perceptual identification performance and priming are impaired in amnesia. They also suggested certain shortcomings in the experiments of Hamann et al., who found normal baseline performance and normal priming in amnesia across a wide range of performance accuracies. In reply, the authors of this article suggest that the position of Ostergaard and Jernigan rests on selective consideration of data, inaccurate assumptions concerning 1 patient's priming performance (A.B.), and debatable concerns about the masking stimuli, ceiling effects, and presentation time of study items that were used. In addition, the authors of the present article suggest that Ostergaard and Jernigan have based their own experimental work on a task and test method that may not be optimal for studying priming.

Keywords

PsychologyPriming (agriculture)PerceptionAmnesiaRepetition (rhetorical device)Cognitive psychologyNeuroscience

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Memory: Performance, knowledge, and experience

Abstract The relation between three aspects of memory—behaviour, knowledge, and conscious experience—is discussed. Memory research of the past has tended to concentrate on memor...

1989 The European Journal of Cognitive Psy... 168 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
131-135
Citations
5
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

5
OpenAlex

Cite This

Larry R. Squire, Stephan Hamann, Daniel L. Schacter (1996). Intact baseline performance and priming in amnesia: Reply to Ostergaard and Jernigan.. Neuropsychology , 10 (1) , 131-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.10.1.131

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0894-4105.10.1.131