Abstract

This paper successfully tests on a sample of 71 countries for the period 1960–85 the following hypotheses. Income inequality, by fuelling social discontent, increases sociopolitical instability. The latter, by creating uncertainty in the politico-economic environment, reduces investment. As a consequence, income inequality and investment are inversely related. Since investment is a primary engine of growth, this paper identifies a channel for an inverse relationship between income inequality and growth. We measure socio-political instability with indices which capture the occurrence of more or less violent phenomena of political unrest and we test our hypotheses by estimating a two-equation model in which the endogenous variables are investment and an index of socio-political instability. Our results are robust to sensitivity analysis on the specification of the model and the measure of political instability, and are unchanged when the model is estimated using robust regression techniques.

Keywords

Political instabilityDistribution (mathematics)PoliticsInvestment (military)InstabilityEconomicsPolitical scienceMathematicsMechanicsPhysicsLawMathematical analysis

Related Publications

Corruption and Growth

This paper analyzes a newly assembled data set consisting of subjective indices of corruption, the amount of red tape, the efficiency of the judicial system, and various categor...

1995 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 8167 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
preprint
Citations
1461
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1461
OpenAlex

Cite This

Alberto Alesina, Roberto Perotti (1993). Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment. . https://doi.org/10.3386/w4486

Identifiers

DOI
10.3386/w4486