Abstract

Quality is a very important parameter for all objects and their functionalities. In image-based object recognition, image quality is a prime criterion. For authentic image quality evaluation, ground truth is required. But in practice, it is very difficult to find the ground truth. Usually, image quality is being assessed by full reference metrics, like MSE (Mean Square Error) and PSNR (Peak Signal to Noise Ratio). In contrast to MSE and PSNR, recently, two more full reference metrics SSIM (Structured Similarity Indexing Method) and FSIM (Feature Similarity Indexing Method) are developed with a view to compare the structural and feature similarity measures between restored and original objects on the basis of perception. This paper is mainly stressed on comparing different image quality metrics to give a comprehensive view. Experimentation with these metrics using benchmark images is performed through denoising for different noise concentrations. All metrics have given consistent results. However, from representation perspective, SSIM and FSIM are normalized, but MSE and PSNR are not; and from semantic perspective, MSE and PSNR are giving only absolute error; on the other hand, SSIM and PSNR are giving perception and saliency-based error. So, SSIM and FSIM can be treated more understandable than the MSE and PSNR.

Keywords

Peak signal-to-noise ratioMean squared errorArtificial intelligenceGround truthPattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Image qualitySimilarity (geometry)MathematicsBenchmark (surveying)Perspective (graphical)Quality (philosophy)Noise (video)Computer scienceImage (mathematics)Computer visionStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2019
Type
article
Volume
07
Issue
03
Pages
8-18
Citations
1449
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1449
OpenAlex
83
Influential
1261
CrossRef

Cite This

Umme Sara, Morium Akter, Mohammad Shorif Uddin (2019). Image Quality Assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR—A Comparative Study. Journal of Computer and Communications , 07 (03) , 8-18. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2019.73002

Identifiers

DOI
10.4236/jcc.2019.73002

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%