Abstract

This reply to Meyer explains again that cell means, although usually the results of greatest interest, should not be confused with interaction effects. Unless all main effects are 0, one cannot accurately interpret an interaction by plotting the cell means. To interpret an interaction, it is the residuals remaining after removal of constituent effects (e.g., row and column effects in 2-factor analyses) that must be examined

Keywords

Zero (linguistics)PsychologyMathematicsStatisticsPhilosophyLinguistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Conduction in non-crystalline systems

Abstract A summary is given of what is now known about the existence of localized states for electrons in three-dimensional disordered systems, and what can be conjectured about...

1968 Philosophical magazine 462 citations

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
574-576
Citations
109
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

109
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ralph L. Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal (1991). If you're looking at the cell means, you're not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero).. Psychological Bulletin , 110 (3) , 574-576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.574

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.574