Abstract
This reply to Meyer explains again that cell means, although usually the results of greatest interest, should not be confused with interaction effects. Unless all main effects are 0, one cannot accurately interpret an interaction by plotting the cell means. To interpret an interaction, it is the residuals remaining after removal of constituent effects (e.g., row and column effects in 2-factor analyses) that must be examined
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The effects of surface tension and viscosity on the stability of two superposed fluids
ABSTRACT The effect of surface tension on the stability of two superposed fluids can be described in a universal way by a non-dimensional ‘surface tension number’ S which provid...
Stationarity and Persistence in the GARCH(1,1) Model
This paper establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for the stationarity and ergodicity of the GARCH(l.l) process. As a special case, it is shown that the IGARCH(1,1) pro...
Segment Anything
We introduce the Segment Anything (SA) project: a new task, model, and dataset for image segmentation. Using our efficient model in a data collection loop, we built the largest ...
Conduction in non-crystalline systems
Abstract A summary is given of what is now known about the existence of localized states for electrons in three-dimensional disordered systems, and what can be conjectured about...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1991
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 574-576
- Citations
- 109
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.574