Abstract

Alvarez, Garrett and Lange (1991) used cross-national panel data on the Organization for Economic Coordination and Development nations to show that countries with left governments and encompassing labor movements enjoyed superior economic performance. Here we show that the standard errors reported in that article are incorrect. Reestimation of the model using ordinary least squares and robust standard errors upholds the major finding of Alvarez, Garrett and Lange, regarding the political and institutional causes of economic growth but leaves the findings for unemployment and inflation open to question. We show that the model used by Alvarez, Garrett and Lange, feasible generalized least squares, cannot produce standard errors when the number of countries analyzed exceeds the length of the time period under analysis. Also, we argue that ordinary least squares with robust standard errors is superior to feasible generalized least squares for typical cross-national panel studies.

Keywords

Ordinary least squaresInflation (cosmology)UnemploymentGeneralized least squaresEconomicsPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)Least-squares function approximationStandard errorEconometricsPanel dataMacroeconomicsStatisticsPolitical scienceMathematicsLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
erratum
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
945-948
Citations
106
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

106
OpenAlex

Cite This

Geoffrey Garrett, Peter Lange, Nathaniel Beck et al. (1993). Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum. American Political Science Review , 87 (4) , 945-948. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938825

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2938825