Abstract
A philosophical essay under this title faces severe rhetorical challenges. New accounts of the good life regularly and rapidly turn out to be variations of old ones, subject to a predictable range of decisive objections. Attempts to meet those objections with improved accounts regularly and rapidly lead to a familiar impasse — that while a life of contemplation, or epicurean contentment, or stoic indifference, or religious ecstasy, or creative rebellion, or self-actualization, or many another thing might count as a good life, none of them can plausibly be identified with the good life, or the best life. Given the long history of that impasse, it seems futile to offer yet another candidate for the genus “good life” as if that candidate might be new, or philosophically defensible. And given the weariness, irony, and self-deprecation expected of a philosopher in such an impasse, it is difficult for any substantive proposal on this topic to avoid seeming pretentious.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
A Tool for Reviewers
Peer review lies at the core of science and academic life. In one of its most pervasive forms, peer review for the scientific literature is the main mechanism that research jour...
The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020
Eye health and vision have widespread and profound implications for many aspects of life, health, sustainable development, and the economy. Yet nowadays, many people, families, ...
En Route to Ethical Recommendations for Gene Transfer Clinical Trials
In Geneva, Switzerland, on 2–3 April 2007, Clinigene-NoE (the European Network for the Advancement of Clinical Gene Transfer and Therapy) and Consert (program on Concerted Safet...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1992
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 15-37
- Citations
- 103
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1017/s0265052500001382