Abstract

Abstract Reanalyses, retrospectively analyzing observations over climatological time scales, represent a merger between satellite observations and models to provide globally continuous data and have improved over several generations. Balancing the earth’s global water and energy budgets has been a focus of research for more than two decades. Models tend to their own climate while remotely sensed observations have had varying degrees of uncertainty. This study evaluates the latest NASA reanalysis, the Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA), from a global water and energy cycles perspective, to place it in context of previous work and demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses. MERRA was configured to provide complete budgets in its output diagnostics, including the incremental analysis update (IAU), the term that represents the observations influence on the analyzed states, alongside the physical flux terms. Precipitation in reanalyses is typically sensitive to the observational analysis. For MERRA, the global mean precipitation bias and spatial variability are more comparable to merged satellite observations [the Global Precipitation and Climatology Project (GPCP) and Climate Prediction Center Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CMAP)] than previous generations of reanalyses. MERRA ocean evaporation also has a much lower value, which is comparable to independently derived estimate datasets. The global energy budget shows that MERRA cloud effects may be generally weak, leading to excess shortwave radiation reaching the ocean surface. Evaluating the MERRA time series of budget terms, a significant change occurs that does not appear to be represented in observations. In 1999, the global analysis increments of water vapor changes sign from negative to positive and primarily lead to more oceanic precipitation. This change is coincident with the beginning of Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) radiance assimilation. Previous and current reanalyses all exhibit some sensitivity to perturbations in the observation record, and this remains a significant research topic for reanalysis development. The effect of the changing observing system is evaluated for MERRA water and energy budget terms.

Keywords

ClimatologyEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationContext (archaeology)SatelliteShortwave radiationMeteorologyShortwaveClimate modelWater cycleAtmospheric sciencesClimate changeGeologyGeography

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The ERA5 global reanalysis

Abstract Within the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), ECMWF is producing the ERA5 reanalysis which, once completed, will embody a detailed record of the global atmosphere...

2020 Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteor... 26490 citations

Publication Info

Year
2011
Type
article
Volume
24
Issue
22
Pages
5721-5739
Citations
259
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

259
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael G. Bosilovich, Franklin R. Robertson, Junye Chen (2011). Global Energy and Water Budgets in MERRA. Journal of Climate , 24 (22) , 5721-5739. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jcli4175.1

Identifiers

DOI
10.1175/2011jcli4175.1