Abstract
Randomised controlled trials are widely accepted as the most reliable method of determining effectiveness, but most trials have evaluated the effects of a single intervention such as a drug. Recognition is increasing that other, non-pharmacological interventions should also be rigorously evaluated.1-3 This paper examines the design and execution of research required to address the additional problems resulting from evaluation of complex interventions—that is, those “made up of various interconnecting parts.”4 The issues dealt with are discussed in a longer Medical Research Council paper (www.mrc.ac.uk/complex_packages.html). We focus on randomised trials but believe that this approach could be adapted to other designs when they are more appropriate. #### Summary points Complex interventions are those that include several components The evaluation of complex interventions is difficult because of problems of developing, identifying, documenting, and reproducing the intervention A phased approach to the development and evaluation of complex interventions is proposed to help researchers define clearly where they are in the research process Evaluation of complex interventions requires use of qualitative and quantitative evidence There are specific difficulties in defining, developing, documenting, and reproducing complex interventions that are subject to more variation than a drug. A typical example would be the design of a trial to evaluate the benefits of specialist stroke units. Such a trial would have to consider the expertise of various health professionals as well as investigations, drugs, treatment guidelines, and arrangements for discharge and follow up. Stroke units may also vary in terms of organisation, management, and skill mix. The active components of the stroke unit may be difficult to specify, making it difficult to replicate the intervention. The box gives other examples of complex interventions. #### Examples of complex interventions Service delivery and organisation: Stroke units Hospital at home Interventions directed at health professionals' behaviour: Strategies for implementing guidelines Computerised decision support Community interventions: Community …
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Background and Purpose— The authors present an overview of the current evidence and management recommendations for evaluation and treatment of adults with acute ischemic stroke....
Guidelines and caveats for quality of life measurement in clinical practice and research.
"Quality of Life" is rapidly becoming part of the clinical evaluation process, both as a specific outcome measure in formal clinical trials, and as a bedside concept. This paper...
Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it?
The goal of evidence-based medicine is ultimately to improve patient outcomes and quality of care. Systematic reviews of the available published evidence are required to identif...
2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy
The objective is to provide guidance for pregnant women and obstetric care and exercise professionals on prenatal physical activity. The outcomes evaluated were maternal, fetal ...
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
Background and Purpose— The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations in a single document for clinicians caring for adult pat...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 7262
- Pages
- 694-696
- Citations
- 3415
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694