Abstract

The position that the body is constructed is one that is surely, if not immediately, associated with Michel Foucault. In separate contexts, Foucault appears paradoxically to criticize both Freud and Nietzsche for assuming a prediscursive ontology of the body and its drives. In effect, the statement, 'the body is constructed', refuses to allow that the indefinite article is itself a construction that calls for a genealogical account. Within a number of texts, Foucault clearly questions whether there is a to bodies which is in any sense separable from the ideational or cultural meanings that constitute bodies within specific social fields. Within Nietzsche, Genealogy, History, Foucault describes the body through a series of metaphors and figures, yet predominantly as a surface, a set of multidirectional forces, and as the scene or site of a cultural inscription. By maintaining a body prior to its cultural inscription, Foucault appears to assume a materiality to the body prior to its signification and form.

Keywords

PhilosophyAnalytic philosophyContemporary philosophyEpistemologyAestheticsLiteratureArt

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1989
Type
article
Volume
86
Issue
11
Pages
601-607
Citations
224
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

224
OpenAlex

Cite This

Judith Butler (1989). Foucault and the Paradox of Bodily Inscriptions. The Journal of Philosophy , 86 (11) , 601-607. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil198986117

Identifiers

DOI
10.5840/jphil198986117