Abstract

The follow-up is the great exposer of truth, the rock on which many fine theories are wrecked and upon which better ones can be built; it is to the psychiatrist what the postmortem is to the physician. —<i>P. D. Scott</i> THE CAUSE of most medical and psychiatric illnesses is unknown. Even without knowledge of etiology, however, the physician can diagnose, predict and treat. To accomplish this he may rely to some extent on personal experience, but this alone is rarely sufficient. A knowledge of "the literature" is usually essential. Especially helpful are follow-up studies: published reports of groups of patients having similar symptoms followed over time to determine both "natural" outcome and outcome as influenced by treatment. To illustrate their usefulness we have reviewed follow-up studies pertaining to one illness, obsessive compulsive neurosis, and summarized the findings. Of the 13 studies reviewed,

Keywords

NeurosisEtiologyPsychologyPsychotherapistPsychiatryOutcome (game theory)Medical illnessClinical psychologyIllness behavior

Related Publications

The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale

The development design and reliability of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale have been described elsewhere. We focused on the validity of the Yale-Brown Scale and its sen...

1989 Archives of General Psychiatry 2740 citations

Publication Info

Year
1969
Type
article
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
182-182
Citations
216
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

216
OpenAlex

Cite This

Donald W. Goodwin (1969). Follow-Up Studies in Obsessional Neurosis. Archives of General Psychiatry , 20 (2) , 182-182. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740140054006

Identifiers

DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740140054006