Abstract

Abstract. Based on the assumption that binary classification tasks are often processed asymmetrically (figure-ground asymmetries), two experiments showed that association alone cannot account for effects observed in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Experiment 1 (N = 16) replicated a standard version of the IAT effect using old vs. young names as target categories and good and bad words as attribute categories. However, reliable compatibility effects were also found for a modified version of the task in which neutral words vs. nonwords instead of good vs. bad words were used as attribute categories. In Experiment 2 (N = 8), a reversed IAT effect was observed after the figure-ground asymmetry in the target dimension had been inverted by a previous go/nogo detection task in which participants searched for exemplars of the category “young.\ The experiments support the hypothesis that figure-ground asymmetries produce compatibility effects in the IAT and suggest that IAT effects do not rely exclusively on evaluative associations between the target and attribute categories.

Keywords

Implicit-association testPsychologyFigure–groundCognitive psychologyAssociation (psychology)Social psychologyCommon groundAsymmetryPerception

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
94-106
Citations
155
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

155
OpenAlex

Cite This

Klaus Rothermund, Dirk Wentura (2001). Figure-Ground Asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) , 48 (2) , 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.94

Identifiers

DOI
10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.94