Abstract
Several methods, mostly based on a consideration of the eigenvalues, have been previously used to determine the number of factors to retain in a factor analysis. This paper shows how split-half factor comparabilities, based on factor scores, can provide a direct and unambiguous method of determining the number of reliable factors that should be retained, and of assessing the appropriate rotation that should be used. The method is particularly appropriate for taxonomic factor analysis, where the factor scores are to be used as summary or classificatory measures. It is shown that, for respondents from non-homogenous populations, split-halves based on the sub-populations should be considered, as well as random split-halves. The discussion is supported by a number of principal components analyses, using synthetic data sets of known factor structure and an actual semantic response data bank.
Keywords
ComparabilityFactor analysisPrincipal component analysisVarimax rotationFactor (programming language)StatisticsRotation (mathematics)MathematicsComputer scienceEconometricsArtificial intelligencePsychometricsCombinatorics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The five‐factor personality inventory: cross‐cultural generalizability across 13 countries
In the present study, we investigated the structural invariance of the Five‐Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI) across a variety of cultures. Self‐report data sets from ten Euro...
Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness
This is an account of further work on a rating scale for depressive states, including a detailed discussion on the general problems of comparing successive samples from a ‘popul...
Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis
Factor analysis is particularly suitable to extract few factors from the large number of related variables to a more manageable number, prior to using them in other analysis suc...
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in a Sample of University Students
A sample of 72 university students was administered the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Item responses were intercorrelated and subjected to a principal factors analysis follow...
Estimation and Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis
A distinction is drawn between the method of principal components developed by Hotelling and the common factor analysis discussed in psychological literature both from the point...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1983
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-218
- Citations
- 219
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
219
OpenAlex
Cite This
James E. Everett
(1983).
Factor Comparability As A Means Of Determining The Number Of Factors And Their Rotation.
Multivariate Behavioral Research
, 18
(2)
, 197-218.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_5
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_5