Abstract

Significance Social media sites are often blamed for exacerbating political polarization by creating “echo chambers” that prevent people from being exposed to information that contradicts their preexisting beliefs. We conducted a field experiment that offered a large group of Democrats and Republicans financial compensation to follow bots that retweeted messages by elected officials and opinion leaders with opposing political views. Republican participants expressed substantially more conservative views after following a liberal Twitter bot, whereas Democrats’ attitudes became slightly more liberal after following a conservative Twitter bot—although this effect was not statistically significant. Despite several limitations, this study has important implications for the emerging field of computational social science and ongoing efforts to reduce political polarization online.

Keywords

Polarization (electrochemistry)PoliticsSocial mediaPolitical scienceFinancial compensationPublic relationsPolitical economyCompensation (psychology)Social psychologyLawPsychologySociology

MeSH Terms

DemocracyFemaleHumansMalePolitical ActivismSocial MediaUnited States

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2018
Type
article
Volume
115
Issue
37
Pages
9216-9221
Citations
1608
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1608
OpenAlex
63
Influential

Cite This

Christopher A. Bail, Lisa P. Argyle, Taylor Brown et al. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115 (37) , 9216-9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115

Identifiers

DOI
10.1073/pnas.1804840115
PMID
30154168
PMCID
PMC6140520

Data Quality

Data completeness: 90%