Abstract

This paper considers the relation between the exploration of new possibilities and the exploitation of old certainties in organizational learning. It examines some complications in allocating resources between the two, particularly those introduced by the distribution of costs and benefits across time and space, and the effects of ecological interaction. Two general situations involving the development and use of knowledge in organizations are modeled. The first is the case of mutual learning between members of an organization and an organizational code. The second is the case of learning and competitive advantage in competition for primacy. The paper develops an argument that adaptive processes, by refining exploitation more rapidly than exploration, are likely to become effective in the short run but self-destructive in the long run. The possibility that certain common organizational practices ameliorate that tendency is assessed.

Keywords

Organizational learningArgument (complex analysis)Competition (biology)Competitive advantageKnowledge managementRelation (database)Space (punctuation)Computer scienceBusinessIndustrial organizationMarketingEcology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Replication as Strategy

Replication, a familiar phenomenon sometimes referred to as the “McDonalds approach,” entails the creation and operation of a large number of similar outlets that deliver a prod...

2001 Organization Science 1291 citations

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
71-87
Citations
20485
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

20485
OpenAlex

Cite This

James G. March (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science , 2 (1) , 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

Identifiers

DOI
10.1287/orsc.2.1.71