Abstract

What circumstances favor the realization of mutual interests in the absence of centralized authority? And through what strategies can nations foster the emergence of cooperation by altering the circumstances that they confront? Elementary game theory suggests three sets of conditions that serve as proximate explanations of the incidence of cooperation and discord: (i) Payoff Structure: Mutual and Conflicting Preferences; (2) The Shadow of the Future: Single-play and Iterated Games; and (3) Number of Players: Two-Person and N-Person Games. Each of these three attributes of context may be subject to willful modification. Nations may create the preconditions for cooperation through strategies to alter payoffs, lengthen the shadow of the future, and reduce the number of actors required to realize limited mutual interests.

Keywords

Shadow (psychology)Stochastic gameContext (archaeology)Realization (probability)Non-cooperative gameGame theoryLaw and economicsEconomicsMicroeconomicsPsychologyMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Evolution and the Theory of Games

In this 1982 book, the theory of games, first developed to analyse economic behaviour, is modified so that it can be applied to evolving populations. John Maynard Smith's concep...

1982 Cambridge University Press eBooks 6826 citations

Publication Info

Year
1985
Type
article
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
1-24
Citations
599
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

599
OpenAlex

Cite This

Kenneth A. Oye (1985). Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics , 38 (1) , 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010349

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2010349