Abstract
The capabilities approach to the firm postulates that firms vertically integrate activities for which they possess capabilities that are superior to potential suppliers'. The comparative contracting approach, in contrast, emphasizes high asset specificity as leading to vertical integration. This paper compares the two sets of explanations on make-or-buy decisions made by a large firm. It finds that in some cases asset specificity alone is determinant, but in others capabilities and combinations of considerations are explanatory. Analysis of the data also provides insights about the mechanisms through which capabilities operate. In particular, the similarity of the knowledge bases associated with various activities, and the time required to acquire knowledge, appear as important indicators of the importance of capabilities to vertical integration decisions.
Keywords
Vertical integrationAsset specificityAsset (computer security)Contrast (vision)BusinessIndustrial organizationSimilarity (geometry)Knowledge managementMarketingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTransaction costFinance
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The “Move to the Middle” Hypothesis
:Investments to increase the level of explicit coordination with outside agents have generally resulted in increased risk to the firm; firms have traditionally avoided this incr...
Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process
More than forty years have passed since Coase's fundamental insight that transaction, coordination, and contracting costs must be considered explicitly in explaining the extent ...
Asset Specificity and the Political Behavior of Firms: Lobbying for Subsidies in Norway
Previous research into endogenous trade policy has described extensively the political incentives of firms with specific assets, but no studies have shown directly that firms be...
Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology
How should we understand why firms exist? A prevailing view has been that they serve to keep in check the transaction costs arising from the self-interested motivations of indiv...
Vertical Integration and the Distribution of Property Rights
What is a firm? What are the determinants of how vertically integrated are the activities of the firm? This paper builds on the foundations laid by Coase (1937), Williamson (197...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-150
- Citations
- 491
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
491
OpenAlex
Cite This
Nicholas Argyres
(1996).
EVIDENCE ON THE ROLE OF FIRM CAPABILITIES IN VERTICAL INTEGRATION DECISIONS.
Strategic Management Journal
, 17
(2)
, 129-150.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199602)17:2<129::aid-smj798>3.0.co;2-h
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199602)17:2<129::aid-smj798>3.0.co;2-h