Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a...

Keywords

Systematic reviewMedicineMEDLINEStatement (logic)GuidelineMeta-analysisFamily medicinePathology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page , Joanne E. McKenzie , Patrick M. Bossuyt +23 more

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...

2021 Systematic Reviews 12418 citations

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page , Joanne E. McKenzie , Patrick M. Bossuyt +23 more

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...

2021 International Journal of Surgery 10623 citations

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page , Joanne E. McKenzie , Patrick M. Bossuyt +23 more

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...

2021 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 3763 citations

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page , Joanne E. McKenzie , Patrick M. Bossuyt +23 more

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...

2021 BMJ 76381 citations

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page , Joanne E. McKenzie , Patrick M. Bossuyt +23 more

Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently...

2020 5089 citations

Publication Info

Year: 2017
Type: review
Volume: 6
Issue: 1
Pages: 263-263
Citations: 694
Access: Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

694

OpenAlex

Cite This

APA Style

                            
                                    Matthew J. Page, 
                                
                                    David Moher
                                
                            (2017). 
                            Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. 
                            Systematic Reviews
                            , 6
                            (1)
                            , 263-263.
                            https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8

Identifiers

DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8