Abstract

Abstract Measurement invariance is usually tested using Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis, which examines the change in the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) when cross-group constraints are imposed on a measurement model. Although many studies have examined the properties of GFI as indicators of overall model fit for single-group data, there have been none to date that examine how GFIs change when between-group constraints are added to a measurement model. The lack of a consensus about what constitutes significant GFI differences places limits on measurement invariance testing. We examine 20 GFIs based on the minimum fit function. A simulation under the two-group situation was used to examine changes in the GFIs (ΔGFIs) when invariance constraints were added. Based on the results, we recommend using Δcomparative fit index, ΔGamma hat, and ΔMcDonald's Noncentrality Index to evaluate measurement invariance. These three ΔGFIs are independent of both model complexity and sample size, and are not correlated with the overall fit measures. We propose critical values of these ΔGFIs that indicate measurement invariance.

Keywords

Goodness of fitMeasurement invarianceConfirmatory factor analysisStatisticsStructural equation modelingMathematicsEconometricsIndex (typography)Factor analysisPsychologyComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
article
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
233-255
Citations
14519
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

14519
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gordon W. Cheung, Roger B. Rensvold (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal , 9 (2) , 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5

Identifiers

DOI
10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5