Abstract

We may learn from our mistakes, but this work argues that, where experimental knowledge is concerned, we haven't begun to learn enough. It provides a critique of the subjective Bayesian view of statistical inference, and proposes the author's own error-statistical approach as a more robust framework for the epistemology of experiment. Deborah Mayo seeks to address the needs of researchers who work with statistical analysis, and simultaneously engages the basic philosophical problems of objectivity and rationality. Mayo has argued for an account of learning from error that goes beyond detecting logical inconsistencies. In this book, she presents her complete programme for how we learn about the world by being shrewd inquisitors of error, white gloves off. Her approach should be relevant to philosophers, historians and sociologists of science, as well as researchers in the physical, biological and social sciences whose work depends upon statistical analysis.

Keywords

Objectivity (philosophy)RationalityEpistemologyStatistical inferenceInferencePhilosophy of scienceBayesian probabilitySociologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophyMathematicsStatistics

Related Publications

Explaining the Gibbs Sampler

Abstract Computer-intensive algorithms, such as the Gibbs sampler, have become increasingly popular statistical tools, both in applied and theoretical work. The properties of su...

1992 The American Statistician 2342 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
book
Volume
15
Issue
1
Citations
699
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

699
OpenAlex

Cite This

Deborah G. Mayo (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. , 15 (1) . https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226511993.001.0001

Identifiers

DOI
10.7208/chicago/9780226511993.001.0001