Abstract
This paper examines the concept of empathetic validity, that is, the potential of practitioner research in its processes and outcomes to transform the emotional dispositions of people towards each other, such that greater empathy and regard are created. The paper argues that practitioner research that is high in empathetic validity contributes to positive human relationships and, as such, is an important form of research in an age of increasing violence as well as stress and tension in the workplace. The paper makes a distinction between internal empathetic validity (that which changes the practitioner researcher and research beneficiaries) and external empathetic validity (that which influences audiences with whom the practitioner research is shared). The argument draws upon three kinds of data: a range of emotional transformations I have experienced as a practitioner researcher myself in a current project; data from colleagues who have reported emotional transformation as a result of their practitioner research; and accounts from published literature. Both positive and negative instances are examined. The paper concludes that there is enough evidence for the validity of this concept for it to warrant serious consideration by practitioner researchers and by the broader research community.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum
Importance The rapid expansion of virtual health care has caused a surge in patient messages concomitant with more work and burnout among health care professionals. Artificial i...
Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ
Is IQ destiny? Perhaps not nearly as much as humans think. This text argues that our view of human intelligence is far too narrow, ignoring a crucial range of abilities that mat...
Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?
Abstract Numerous theoretical frameworks have been developed to explain the gap between the possession of environmental knowledge and environmental awareness, and displaying pro...
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
This is the first in a series of four articles The quality of controlled trials is of obvious relevance to systematic reviews. If the “raw material” is flawed then the conclus...
Development of an empathy scale.
The concept of empathy—the intellectual or imaginative apprehension of another's condition or state of mind— is central for understanding a broad range of social phenomena inclu...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2008
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-290
- Citations
- 72
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/09650790802011973