Abstract

Many transnational organisations work to support efforts to eliminate maternal and child undernutrition in high-burden countries. Financial, intellectual, and personal linkages bind these organisations loosely together as components of an international nutrition system. In this paper, we argue that such a system should deliver in four functional areas: stewardship, mobilisation of financial resources, direct provision of nutrition services at times of natural disaster or conflict, and human and institutional resource strengthening. We review quantitative and qualitative data from various sources to assess the performance of the system in each of these areas, and find substantial shortcomings. Fragmentation, lack of an evidence base for prioritised action, institutional inertia, and failure to join up with promising developments in parallel sectors are recurrent themes. Many of these weaknesses can be attributed to systemic problems affecting most organisations working in the field; these are analysed using a problem tree approach. We also make recommendations to overcome some of the most important problems, and we propose five priority actions for the development of a new international architecture.

Keywords

Stewardship (theology)MalnutritionAction (physics)Work (physics)BusinessInternational ActionFragmentation (computing)Risk analysis (engineering)Public relationsPolitical scienceEconomic growthComputer scienceEconomicsEngineering

MeSH Terms

Developing CountriesFinancial SupportFood ServicesHumansInternational AgenciesMalnutritionNutritional StatusOrganizationsPublic Health

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2008
Type
article
Volume
371
Issue
9612
Pages
608-621
Citations
248
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

248
OpenAlex
10
Influential
180
CrossRef

Cite This

Saul S. Morris, Bruce Cogill, Ricardo Uauy (2008). Effective international action against undernutrition: why has it proven so difficult and what can be done to accelerate progress?. The Lancet , 371 (9612) , 608-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61695-x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61695-x
PMID
18206225

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%