Abstract

The successful application of a conceptual rainfall‐runoff (CRR) model depends on how well it is calibrated. Despite the popularity of CRR models, reports in the literature indicate that it is typically difficult, if not impossible, to obtain unique optimal values for their parameters using automatic calibration methods. Unless the best set of parameters associated with a given calibration data set can be found, it is difficult to determine how sensitive the parameter estimates (and hence the model forecasts) are to factors such as input and output data error, model error, quantity and quality of data, objective function used, and so on. Results are presented that establish clearly the nature of the multiple optima problem for the research CRR model SIXPAR. These results suggest that the CRR model optimization problem is more difficult than had been previously thought and that currently used local search procedures have a very low probability of successfully finding the optimal parameter sets. Next, the performance of three existing global search procedures are evaluated on the model SIXPAR. Finally, a powerful new global optimization procedure is presented, entitled the shuffled complex evolution (SCE‐UA) method, which was able to consistently locate the global optimum of the SIXPAR model, and appears to be capable of efficiently and effectively solving the CRR model optimization problem.

Keywords

CalibrationGlobal optimizationSet (abstract data type)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceFunction (biology)Data setOptimization problemData miningAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1992
Type
article
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1015-1031
Citations
3307
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3307
OpenAlex

Cite This

Qingyun Duan, Soroosh Sorooshian, Vijai Kumar Gupta (1992). Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models. Water Resources Research , 28 (4) , 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91wr02985

Identifiers

DOI
10.1029/91wr02985