Abstract

Can extrinsic uncertainty ("animal spirits," "market psychology," "sunspots,"...) play a significant role in rational expectations equilibrium models? We establish that extrinsic uncertainty cannot matter in the static Arrow-Debreu economy with complete markets. But we also establish that extrinsic uncertainty can matter in the overlapping-generations economy with complete markets but where market participation is limited to those consumers alive when the markets are open. Equilibrium allocations in which extrinsic uncertainty plays no role are Pareto optimal in the traditional sense. Equilibrium allocations in which extrinsic uncertainty does play a role are Pareto optimal in a (weaker) sense which is appropriate to dynamic analysis.

Keywords

EconomicsPareto principleArrowSunspotMicroeconomicsRational expectationsGeneral equilibrium theoryMathematical economicsEconometricsComputer sciencePhysics

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1983
Type
article
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
193-227
Citations
989
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

989
OpenAlex

Cite This

David Cass, Karl Shell (1983). Do Sunspots Matter?. Journal of Political Economy , 91 (2) , 193-227. https://doi.org/10.1086/261139

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/261139