Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction

1994 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 561 citations

Abstract

There is a voluminous literature on pollination and dispersal, very little of which deals with the consequences of reproductive failure and its most extreme consequence: extinction. The risk of plant extinctions can be assessed by considering the probability of dispersal or pollinator failure, reproductive dependence on the mutualism and demographic dependence on seeds. Traits for ranking species rapidly according to these three criteria are indicated. Analysis of case studies suggests that plants often compensate for high risk in one of the three categories by low risk in another. For example, selfincompatible plants with rare specialist pollinators often propagate vegetatively. Some systems, including elements of the Cape flora and lowland tropical rain forest, lack compensatory traits and the risk of plant extinction from failed mutualism is high. ‘What escapes the eye, however, is a much more insidious kind of extinction: the extinction of ecological interactions’ Janzen (1974).

Keywords

Mutualism (biology)Extinction (optical mineralogy)PollinationBiologySeed dispersalPollinatorBiological dispersalEcologySeed dispersal syndromeExtinction probabilityPollenPopulationPopulation size

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1994
Type
article
Volume
344
Issue
1307
Pages
83-90
Citations
561
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

561
OpenAlex

Cite This

William J. Bond (1994). Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences , 344 (1307) , 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0055

Identifiers

DOI
10.1098/rstb.1994.0055