Abstract

We estimate diversification's effect on firm value by imputing stand-alone values for individual business segments. Comparing the sum of these stand-alone values to the firm's actual value implies a 13% to 15% average value loss from diversification during 1986–1991. The value loss is smaller when the segments of the diversified firm are in the same two-digit SIC code. We find that overinvestment and cross-subsidization contribute to the value loss. The loss is reduced modestly by tax benefits of diversification.

Keywords

Diversification (marketing strategy)Enterprise valueValue (mathematics)EconomicsMicroeconomicsSubsidyBusinessEconometricsStatisticsFinanceMathematicsMarket economyMarketing

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

DEBT AND TAXES*

The somewhat heterodox views about debt and taxes that will be presented here have evolved over the last few years in the course of countless discussions with several of my pres...

1977 The Journal of Finance 2954 citations

The Capital Structure Puzzle

Stewart C. Myers President of American Finance Association 1983 This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on “The Dividend Puzzle,” which h...

1984 The Journal of Finance 7515 citations

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
39-65
Citations
3145
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3145
OpenAlex

Cite This

Philip G. Berger, Eli Ofek (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics , 37 (1) , 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(94)00798-6

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/0304-405x(94)00798-6