Abstract
We estimate diversification's effect on firm value by imputing stand-alone values for individual business segments. Comparing the sum of these stand-alone values to the firm's actual value implies a 13% to 15% average value loss from diversification during 1986–1991. The value loss is smaller when the segments of the diversified firm are in the same two-digit SIC code. We find that overinvestment and cross-subsidization contribute to the value loss. The loss is reduced modestly by tax benefits of diversification.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance
In this paper, the authors show that Tobin's q and firm diversification are negatively related throughout the 1980s. This negative relation holds for different diversification m...
Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry
We examine the value-relevance to investors of financial (accounting) and nonfinancial information of independent cellular companies and find that, on a stand-alone basis, finan...
DEBT AND TAXES*
The somewhat heterodox views about debt and taxes that will be presented here have evolved over the last few years in the course of countless discussions with several of my pres...
The Capital Structure Puzzle
Stewart C. Myers President of American Finance Association 1983 This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on “The Dividend Puzzle,” which h...
SECURITY PRICES, RISK, AND MAXIMAL GAINS FROM DIVERSIFICATION*
Sections II and III of this paper set forth the simple logic which leads directly to the determination of explicit equilibrium prices of risk assets traded in competitive market...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1995
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-65
- Citations
- 3145
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/0304-405x(94)00798-6