Abstract

Research on dispositional optimism as assessed by the Life Orientation Test (Scheier & Carver, 1985) has been challenged on the grounds that effects attributed to optimism are indistinguishable from those of unmeasured third variables, most notably, neuroticism. Data from 4,309 subjects show that associations between optimism and both depression and aspects of coping remain significant even when the effects of neuroticism, as well as the effects of trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem, are statistically controlled. Thus, the Life Orientation Test does appear to possess adequate predictive and discriminant validity. Examination of the scale on somewhat different grounds, however, does suggest that future applications can benefit from its revision. Thus, we also describe a minor modification to the Life Orientation Test, along with data bearing on the revised scale's psychometric properties.

Keywords

PsychologyOptimismNeuroticismDiscriminant validityTraitPersonalityCoping (psychology)AnxietyClinical psychologyPsychometricsTest (biology)Social psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

MeSH Terms

AdaptationPsychologicalAnxietyFemaleHumansMaleSelf ConceptSelf-Assessment

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1994
Type
article
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1063-1078
Citations
5697
Access
Closed

Citation Metrics

5697
OpenAlex
637
Influential
4782
CrossRef

Cite This

Michael F. Scheier, Charles S. Carver, Michael W. Bridges (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 67 (6) , 1063-1078. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063
PMID
7815302

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%