Abstract

The basic opposition between the tastes of luxury and the tastes of necessity is specified in as many oppositions as there are different ways of asserting one's distinction vis-a-vis the working class and its primary needs, or-which amounts to the same thing-different powers whereby necessity can be kept at a distance. The taste for rare, aristocratic foods points to a traditional cuisine, rich in expensive or rare product. The system of differences becomes clearer when one looks more closely at the patterns of spending on food. The quasi-conscious representation of the approved form of the perceived body, and in particular its thinness or fatness, is not the only mediation through which the social definition of appropriate foods is established. The relation to food-the primary need and pleasure-is only one dimension of the bourgeois relation to the social world.

Keywords

JudgementTasteEpistemologyAestheticsPsychologySociologySocial psychologyPhilosophyNeuroscience

Related Publications

Sampling for qualitative research

The probability sampling techniques used for quantitative studies are rarely appropriate when conducting qualitative research. This article considers and explains the difference...

1996 Family Practice 4022 citations

Publication Info

Year
2018
Type
book-chapter
Pages
141-150
Citations
20357
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

20357
OpenAlex
58
CrossRef

Cite This

Pierre Bourdıeu (2018). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*. Food and Culture , 141-150. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315680347-10

Identifiers

DOI
10.4324/9781315680347-10

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%