Abstract

Abstract As the use of qualitative methods in health research proliferates, it becomes increasingly necessary to consider how the value of a piece of qualitative research should be assessed. This article discusses the problem posed by the novelty and diversity of qualitative approaches within health psychology and considers the question of what criteria are appropriate for assessing the validity of a qualitative analysis. In keeping with the ethos of much qualitative research, some open-ended, flexible principles are suggested as a guide to the quality of a qualitative study: sensitivity to context; commitment and rigour; transparency and coherence; impact and importance. Examples are given of the very different ways in which various forms of qualitative research can meet these criteria.

Keywords

Qualitative researchRigourPsychologyTransparency (behavior)Context (archaeology)NoveltySocial psychologyManagement scienceApplied psychologyEpistemologySociologyComputer scienceSocial science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

What is Good Qualitative Research?

Qualitative research has an enormous amount to contribute to the fields of health, medicine and public health but readers and reviewers from these fields have little understandi...

2006 Journal of Health Psychology 389 citations

Standards for Qualitative Research

One of the greatest obstacles to the identification of excellence in qualitative studies is the lack of generally accepted criteria. The criteria developed for quantitative stud...

1989 Nursing Science Quarterly 250 citations

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
215-228
Citations
2166
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2166
OpenAlex

Cite This

Lucy Yardley (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology and Health , 15 (2) , 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/08870440008400302