Abstract

Two methods of assessing adverse drug effects-an open-ended question versus a checklist-were compared in a clinical study involving 515 patients being treated with bacampicillin for gonorrhea. Results indicate that adverse reactions are reported more frequently if a checklist is used. However, it was also observed that more serious side effects are usually reported in response to an open-ended question rather than a checklist. Thus it was concluded that the optimal procedure for assessing adverse reactions is to record responses to both an open-ended question and a checklist.

Keywords

ChecklistMedicineAdverse effectDrug reactionClinical trialDrugOpen labelGonorrheaAdverse drug reactionIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePharmacologyFamily medicine

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1981
Type
article
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
450-2
Citations
24
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

24
OpenAlex

Cite This

Johan Wallin, Jan Sjövall (1981). Detection of adverse drug reactions in a clinical trial using two types of questioning.. PubMed , 3 (6) , 450-2.